Pagan Inquisition Part 2: Pagans and Nature

Our chief weapon is surprise…surprise and fear…fear and surprise…. Our two weapons are fear and surprise…and ruthless efficiency…. Our three weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency…and an almost fanatical devotion to Ronald Hutton…. Our four…no… Amongst our weapons…. Amongst our weaponry……are such elements as fear… surprise…. I’ll come in again.

In continuation of addressing this potent series of questions that I began in the previous post, I happily deliver unto you Part 2: Pagans and Nature:

Are you a Pagan because you are drawn to or feel a connection with nature?

Boy howdy. Damn straight. Darn tootin’.

That’s the short answer.

Here’s the longer, more expository one:

Not all Pagans identify as earth-centered, of course. It’s important to point that out. For me, however, well – safe to say it’s pretty central to my worship. Though it wasn’t always, at least not overtly.

It is true that as a dreamy-eyed preteen I spent a lot of time outside in my backyard, peering at snowflakes and trying to see fairies. I loved the wind and grass. I was shot through with a visceral love for the west and the southwest in particular (one memory that stands out in the passage of my spiritual journey was a moment when I was about 10 years old – I stepped from the car at a truckstop in Arizona and felt the December desert air rocket straight through my body, filling me instantly with a fierce, white-hot tumble of pure joy). I felt ecstatically overwhelmed by red rocks, deserts, sunsets, mountains and fire. I was enchanted, as so many are, by the silver astonishment of the moon. I knew that these things were alive and thinking beings and that they were speaking to me, and I had no qualms about speaking to them in return, despite some fairly substantial language barriers. There is no question that many of my early spiritual experiences were rooted in relationship with the natural world. Yet, while I did have a profound spiritual connection with nature and was thrilled to find a religion that spoke to that part of me, I admit that my attraction to Paganism was dominated primarily at first by another issue. I was obsessed with magic. I was a baby geek, soaking in a glorious medium of Princess Bride, The NeverEnding Story, and a veritable avalanche of fantasy novels – and nearly crying myself to sleep at night haunted by a desperate longing for something that I couldn’t put a name to – when I found out that there were actually people out there who believed that magic was real. You can imagine my level of enthusiasm upon the revelation of this miracle.

It didn’t take long for me to figure out however that magic, for me, is simply another word for the rush that consumed me at the truckstop that day in Arizona, or the liquid glory pouring to earth in the spill of moonlight. That magic is natural and that it springs bubbling out of the earth and the trees and the rocks and moves with a sweet, shocking grace through the marrow of all things. And that there are no real boundaries between me, the natural world, magic, relationship, the gods, the planet, or any activism on the planet’s behalf. That indeed, magic is happening with every breath and in every move of my body (and that the web of ultimate connection can be touched, yes, and threads plucked to shift the tides of the world in one’s favor in harmony with the Isness). Magic can be complex or simple – a weaving or a seed, Fibonacci numbers, a handful of roots, an exquisitely complicated series of movements and words, an Emerald Tablet, the making of medicine, the pouring forth of prayer. No matter where I have found it, it always seems that magic has led me back to the Mama – to Her mountains and Her forms and Her Beauty, and to my body as an expression of Her and the medium through which I experience Her far-flung, lavish, decadent, gritty, sharp, gobsmacked, outrageous being.

Eventually, in addition to the flowering of my rapture in the deep, these connections led me to become inspired by the radical application of spirituality to the struggle on behalf of oppressed communities and the Land.

The development of my spiritual life has directly impacted my political and personal decisions. I became an activist for the queer movement out of my moral belief that all human beings had a right to consensual loving (I know – ridiculous me and my ridiculous beliefs…destroying American families since 1976, huzzah!). I became a feminist out of my religious belief that all peoples are blessed and powerful, possessors of their own worth and agency (*case of the vapors*). And I became an environmentalist because for me there is nothing else that I can be and still call the Mama my home, my shelter, and my god (among several, of course), as She is and will be forever and ever, amen. Though I began as a seeker on the path of the Pagani in order to touch that hungry, secret part of me that wept and yearned towards something ineffable and grand, as I read and prayed and enacted ceremony and ritual over the course of time, the Land began to speak to me, and what She was saying was that if I wanted to lead a life that was in concert with the magic that was in and through her, maybe I ought to start thinking about some of the choices I make. It is remarkable how much I’ve found that each action I take strengthens my religious commitments, which by turn strengthen my resolve to act. These actions are ongoing, and my moral convictions are consistently being changed and deepened through this process. The more I learn, the more this process keeps growing and changing, and the more I become enchanted with the dance – action, movement, change, growth, knowledge, revelation, ecstasy, action, movement…

The Mama is my heartsblood. She is in and through and of me. I am in and through and of Her. A Mystery forever and ever amen. Sometimes it’s too big for any words…which is just how it should be.

So. I became a Pagan partly because I felt an original connection to nature, and through being a Pagan, my connection with nature has been charged and deepened to become the delicious core of my polythea/ologies. I guess it would have been more concise to simply have said that. But it’s more fun to wax ridiculously slap-happy rhapsodic instead.

Do city dwelling Pagans find it difficult to practice in the City?

This has always been an interesting question to me. For the majority of my life I’ve lived amongst the concrete streets of a variety of metropolitan areas (though none as immense as Chicago, New York or L.A. – I’m still really just a bumpkin at heart I guess), though I have also sampled life in the quieter, cricket-chirpin’ districts of the wild places and the cultivated fields of this country. I have been both a citymouse and a countrymouse, though admittedly more of the former, and while I certainly can say that for me, there is something slam-bam fabulous about being able to walk out the door and touch god with my bare feet, lift my hands cupped with fresh water from the river or the pond, and leave offerings at the roots of gnarled trees that shade my window, I have always felt able to connect to the Mama, even in the city (the wind and sun are always wild), so I can’t say that I ever found it difficult to practice within metropolitan areas. Now, from an ecological viewpoint, I personally find cities to be inherently unsustainable enterprises, and I loathe the oppression of concrete, the deafening roar of air-polluting traffic, and all the ecodestructive, human-rights-denying activity that is vital to the survival of a city environment (cities are, after all, the hallmarks of civilization, which has as its fundamental project the killing and suffering of the coded Other for the benefit of the privileged). So certainly, there is a struggle there for me with cities that stems from my earth-centered thea/ologies, but I cannot say that I have ever felt unable to pray, do ritual, perform magic, touch the Mama, feel the blessing stars overhead or the blessing grass underneath me, fight for ecological and/or social justice, or mark the passing of the holy year in the city. And, of course, many, many, many Pagans are city-dwellers, and some have adapted their polythea/ologies and practices to suit that environment. While I choose to cleave more to my countrymouse ways as I grow older, there are cities that remain a precious piece of my multiple souls and I cannot and would not release them. For me it’s yet another manifestation of the quandary of the ecoconscious living within the structures of civilization.

Et Voila!  Next up: Part 3 – Pagans and Community…

5 Comments

  1. christine said,

    August 9, 2007 at 2:24 pm

    Actually, a lot of ecologists and environmentalists are coming around to the notion that the city (at its best, of course) is the only answer to the problem of the human imprint on the planet. Considering that sprawl (including that induced by “innocent,” back-to-the-earth types) is our number one enemy right now, confining human activity to a more pod-like structure (aka, the city) is an answer with a lot of positives. Consider for one example, the fact that that back to earther must drive their car long distances for absolutely everything they need, whereas I can walk or bike to the same resources (a choice I make every single day since I can be– and have been for over 6 years — car free in a city). I can also use my 1/10th of an acre to grow much of my own food; I can eventually (when I can afford it) put solar panels on my roof; and most importantly of all, I am not isolated from other humans but part of a community where each individual can contribute a unique part of the puzzle. As green pagans or green witches or green yoginis or green whatevers, what more could you ask for? No need to justify where we live when it is actually the most ecological choice of all. And bringing magic to the city — through ritual, planting trees, living our convictions — will only make it better.

  2. gospelpagan said,

    August 9, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    Hi Christine,

    That is certainly an excellent set of points, thank you. Of course, not all “back-to-the-landers,” as you call them, employ cars to drive out for everything they need or are isolated from each other – for instance, some growing ecovillages are becoming very close to being completely self-sustaining and are also doing some remarkable work in establishing their own unique cultures. Certainly there are ways to create ecopositive city environments, just as there are ways to create rural ecopositive environments. Both take work. Perhaps I should have clarified that contemporary cities as they currently operate are unsustainable enterprises.

    I don’t happen to subscribe to the belief that there is only one answer in any context to our ecological crisis, but rather a multitude of them, among them of course being the ecological enhancement of our contemporary urban areas (I am personally inspired by some designs for car-less cities, etc.), as well as the solutions being worked out by those who are aiming for a sustainable rural lifestyle. Certainly I did not mean to imply that those who live in a city are incapable of making sustainable, ecoresponsible choices as you have.

    Thank you for your thoughts!

    -S

  3. christine said,

    August 9, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    I didn’t mean to sound argumentative. sorry about that. my main point is that we, as city dwellers, should never ever be apologetic of that fact.
    the problem, as I see it, with ecovillages (besides the economics which tend toward the exclusive to say the least), is the use of previously unused lands. Also, people move out to them, very often, from cities, sucking money, etc. from the tax base, making many cities unsustainable in every way (not just in our ideal green ways). And isn’t reusing old structures (almost) always better than building new?
    I, too, argue with myself about all of this because of noise issues! :)

  4. gospelpagan said,

    August 9, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    :D Never apologize for sounding argumentative.

    Agreed – guilt is rarely useful unless it drives us to *do* something. There is nothing constructive about apologizing for being a city-dweller, or an ecovillager. Obviously there are many in both places who are enacting serious choices for environmental awareness – playing a blame game of who’s more or less eco-friendly, an organic ecovillage farmer or an urban hybrid-driver, is counterproductive.

    As for ecovillages – of course they aren’t perfect solutions, though I don’t know that there are so many people moving to ecovillages that it can be seen as a statistically significant tax drain from a city or that they are “making” cities unsustainable. Of course reusing old structures is better, in my opinion, and some ecovillages do that, in addition to creating new ecopositive structures. It’s all a part of the same drive towards living lighter on the earth – and considering the enormous granite wall we’re up against (corporate, governmental, etc.), I personally can’t fault anyone who is attempting to live in the city *or* an ecovillage in a sustainable way. The point is to push, as you and I are each doing here with each other, against an idea that there is a perfect, or even a superior, approach to living in an ecoconscious way. Multiple strategies, diverse approaches, the same goal: to live in a way that breeds harmony with the planet, social and ecological justice, etc.

    I sincerely appreciate your comments. Thank you!

    -S

  5. August 11, 2007 at 2:25 am

    Our chief weapon is Bad Spelling. Bad Spelling and Bad Grammar.

    Lovely post, Sara. A Pagan who makes her point eloquently and grammatically.

    Terri the English-usage Nazi in Joburg


Post a Comment